Home
Student Login
Staff Login Xavier Society of Law and Justice (XSLAJ) of Xavier Law School (XLS) of St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata (SXUK) organized the second edition of its national flagship event, the Ignatius Trial and Advocacy Competition 2025 (IGNITAC’25) from October 9 to 11, 2025 at the university campus.
The event was supported by an illustrious array of sponsors and collaborators namely Coal India Ltd. as the presenting partner, MCO Legals as the title partner, Asian Paints as the event partner, Aamsrav and RK Electronics as associate partners, Manupatra and LawFoyer as knowledge partners, Dexon Global LLP as the research partner, Legal Bites as the e-resource partner, and LiveLaw.in, Knowledge Steez, DesiKanoon, Legal Specs, and LawBhoomi as media partners.
Dr. Siddhant Chandra
- Nihil Ultra
XLS Events
XSLAJ organizes IGNITAC’25
Date: 09-10-2025
XLS organises seminar on corporate culture
Name of the Convenor:Dr. Rajdip Bhadra Chaudhuri, Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh
Date: 07-08-2025
Placement Committee of the Xavier Law School (XLS) of St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata (SXUK) organised a seminar on August 7, 2025 at the university campus. The topic was “Corporate Culture and Leadership in the Tech Sector.”
Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, Managing Director, Accenture was the speaker. Fr. Dr. Xavier Jeyaraj, S.J., Registrar, SXUK graced the occasion and felicitated Mr. Gupta in the presence of Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee, Dean of XLS; faculty members and students.
The need for such industry-academia interface was highlighted by Fr. Dr. Xavier Jeyaraj, S.J. in his welcome address.
Mr. Gupta reflected upon the practical insight of the corporate culture and leadership qualities of professionals to reach the zenith of their professional life. He explained the importance of leadership and punctuality in the corporate world.
This programme was instrumental in providing leadership strategies to the students who aspire to create their own identity in the professional world. Students of B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) and B.Com. LL.B. (Hons.) of 7th and 9th semesters participated in the seminar.
Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, Managing Director, Accenture was the speaker. Fr. Dr. Xavier Jeyaraj, S.J., Registrar, SXUK graced the occasion and felicitated Mr. Gupta in the presence of Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee, Dean of XLS; faculty members and students.
The need for such industry-academia interface was highlighted by Fr. Dr. Xavier Jeyaraj, S.J. in his welcome address.
Mr. Gupta reflected upon the practical insight of the corporate culture and leadership qualities of professionals to reach the zenith of their professional life. He explained the importance of leadership and punctuality in the corporate world.
This programme was instrumental in providing leadership strategies to the students who aspire to create their own identity in the professional world. Students of B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) and B.Com. LL.B. (Hons.) of 7th and 9th semesters participated in the seminar.
Workshop on Practical Aspect of the Legal Profession
Name of the Convenor: Dr. Rajrupa Sinha Roy.
Date: 14-09-2024
The workshop commenced at 12:45 PM with a brief introduction of the esteemed speaker, Advocate Sourav Chunder, by Mr. Yash Bajoria, one of the Core Committee members of the Moot Court Society (MCS). Following the introduction, Dr. Rajrupa Sinha Roy, the Convener of the MCS, felicitated Advocate Chunder.
Adv. Chunder shared his personal experiences and offered guidance on the practical aspects of the legal profession. He underscored the importance of merit, passion for law, and the joy of receiving one's first brief. He also highlighted the necessity of hard work, diligence, and tenacity to succeed in the legal field, regardless of familial background. He advised students not to be swayed by hearsay or rumours.
Adv. Chunder began the session by observing a one-minute silence in honour of the victim of R G Kar Medical College and Hospital. He initiated an interactive discussion by asking attendees their opinion on Mr. Kapil Sibal’s actions, resulting in 28 attendees finding it acceptable, while 6 disagreed. One of the 6 attendees who disagreed provided a detailed justification for their viewpoint. Adv. Chunder then discussed the Latin maxim “Audi Alteram Partem,” asking the attendees for its meaning. Several students participated in the explanation. Adv. Chunder emphasized the importance of hearing both sides in a legal matter, especially in the context of the R G Kar case.
Adv. Chunder addressed the evolving nature of laws, touching upon the lack of gender-neutral laws and the huge pendency of cases in the judiciary. He emphasized the need for more appointed judges, using the Calcutta High Court's current shortage as an example. Mr. Sourav Chunder ended the session by giving some valuable advice to the students on courtroom argumentation and shared personal anecdotes, including his first legal victory under the guidance of Senior Advocate J. P. Khaitan.
Adv. Chunder shared his personal experiences and offered guidance on the practical aspects of the legal profession. He underscored the importance of merit, passion for law, and the joy of receiving one's first brief. He also highlighted the necessity of hard work, diligence, and tenacity to succeed in the legal field, regardless of familial background. He advised students not to be swayed by hearsay or rumours.
Adv. Chunder began the session by observing a one-minute silence in honour of the victim of R G Kar Medical College and Hospital. He initiated an interactive discussion by asking attendees their opinion on Mr. Kapil Sibal’s actions, resulting in 28 attendees finding it acceptable, while 6 disagreed. One of the 6 attendees who disagreed provided a detailed justification for their viewpoint. Adv. Chunder then discussed the Latin maxim “Audi Alteram Partem,” asking the attendees for its meaning. Several students participated in the explanation. Adv. Chunder emphasized the importance of hearing both sides in a legal matter, especially in the context of the R G Kar case.
Adv. Chunder addressed the evolving nature of laws, touching upon the lack of gender-neutral laws and the huge pendency of cases in the judiciary. He emphasized the need for more appointed judges, using the Calcutta High Court's current shortage as an example. Mr. Sourav Chunder ended the session by giving some valuable advice to the students on courtroom argumentation and shared personal anecdotes, including his first legal victory under the guidance of Senior Advocate J. P. Khaitan.
Seminar on Human Rights Awareness
Name of the speakers/consultants/agencies involved: Dr. Shaleen Das, Coordinator for YHRI at Kolkata.
Name of the Convenor: Dr. Prashna Samaddar and Dr. Utpal Raha.
Date: 14-09-2024
Human Rights Awareness Seminar
The seminar was organized by Xavier Law School, St. Xavier's University in association with Youth for Human Rights International (YHRI) on 14th September 2024. The students of 1st and 3rd Semesters of the Law School attended the seminar. The seminar will be conducted from 10:30 -12:30 on the above-mentioned date. Dr. Shaleen Das, Coordinator for YHRI at Kolkata was the guest speaker. Dr. Utpal Kumar Raha and Dr. Prashna Samaddar coordinated the event primarily under the guidance of the Dean of Xavier Law School, Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee.
The students were briefed about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its various avenues. They were also allowed to interact with the guest speaker in the Q & A session. The lecture and presentation of the guest speaker were followed by a small activity-based session where students were told to express their ideas on chart paper and draw their interpretation of human rights as found relevant for them. The students enjoyed the event thoroughly and were motivated by the learning session.
The seminar was organized by Xavier Law School, St. Xavier's University in association with Youth for Human Rights International (YHRI) on 14th September 2024. The students of 1st and 3rd Semesters of the Law School attended the seminar. The seminar will be conducted from 10:30 -12:30 on the above-mentioned date. Dr. Shaleen Das, Coordinator for YHRI at Kolkata was the guest speaker. Dr. Utpal Kumar Raha and Dr. Prashna Samaddar coordinated the event primarily under the guidance of the Dean of Xavier Law School, Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee.
The students were briefed about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its various avenues. They were also allowed to interact with the guest speaker in the Q & A session. The lecture and presentation of the guest speaker were followed by a small activity-based session where students were told to express their ideas on chart paper and draw their interpretation of human rights as found relevant for them. The students enjoyed the event thoroughly and were motivated by the learning session.
XITAC 24 - Xavier Intra-XLS Trial & Advocacy Competition 2024 (3rd Edition)
Name of the Convenor: Dr. Animesh Das.
Date: 05-09-2024 & 06-09-2024
XITAC’24- Xavier Intra-XLS Trial & Advocacy Competition 2024
The Xavier Society of Law and Justice (XSLAJ) recently organized the third edition of its Annual Flagship Event – XITAC’24 - Xavier Intra-XLS Trial & Advocacy Competition, 2024, in association with MCO Legals (Meharia & Co.) on 5th and 6th September 2024 (Thursday and Friday) in Xavier Law School, St Xavier's University, Kolkata, with an overall participation of over 200 students from all semesters and courses.
The Final Round was judged by the Hon'ble Justice Ashim Kumar Roy, Hon’ble Lokayukta of West Bengal and Mr. Amit Meharia, Managing Partner at MCO Legals (Meharia & Co.).
The team representing the Prosecution in the Final Round of XITAC’24, comprising of Ayush Majumder, Anushka Banerjee, and Shourjo Roychoudhuri, was adjudged the Winner of XITAC’24 and was awarded the Champions Trophy, medals, certificates, and a cash prize of Rs. 5,000. The team representing the Defence in the Final Round consisting of Shreyasi Chakraborty, Shibhangi Sircar, and Avipsha Singha, was declared the Runner-Up and received the corresponding/ trophy, certificates, medals, and a cash prize of Rs. 2,500.
Chandrava Chaudhuri of Semester V was recognized as the “Best Speaker” and was awarded a medal, certificate, and a cash prize of Rs. 2,000. Swastika Aditya of Semester I was awarded the “Best Witness” trophy, certificate, and a cash prize of Rs. 2,500. The team consisting of Chandrava Chaudhuri, Maitrie Jain, and Shreya Bagaria won the “Best Memorial” trophy, certificates, and a cash prize of Rs. 2,000. Soham Ghosh of Semester IX was declared as the “Best Researcher” and received a medal, certificate, and a cash prize of Rs. 1,000.
The Xavier Society of Law and Justice (XSLAJ) recently organized the third edition of its Annual Flagship Event – XITAC’24 - Xavier Intra-XLS Trial & Advocacy Competition, 2024, in association with MCO Legals (Meharia & Co.) on 5th and 6th September 2024 (Thursday and Friday) in Xavier Law School, St Xavier's University, Kolkata, with an overall participation of over 200 students from all semesters and courses.
The Final Round was judged by the Hon'ble Justice Ashim Kumar Roy, Hon’ble Lokayukta of West Bengal and Mr. Amit Meharia, Managing Partner at MCO Legals (Meharia & Co.).
The team representing the Prosecution in the Final Round of XITAC’24, comprising of Ayush Majumder, Anushka Banerjee, and Shourjo Roychoudhuri, was adjudged the Winner of XITAC’24 and was awarded the Champions Trophy, medals, certificates, and a cash prize of Rs. 5,000. The team representing the Defence in the Final Round consisting of Shreyasi Chakraborty, Shibhangi Sircar, and Avipsha Singha, was declared the Runner-Up and received the corresponding/ trophy, certificates, medals, and a cash prize of Rs. 2,500.
Chandrava Chaudhuri of Semester V was recognized as the “Best Speaker” and was awarded a medal, certificate, and a cash prize of Rs. 2,000. Swastika Aditya of Semester I was awarded the “Best Witness” trophy, certificate, and a cash prize of Rs. 2,500. The team consisting of Chandrava Chaudhuri, Maitrie Jain, and Shreya Bagaria won the “Best Memorial” trophy, certificates, and a cash prize of Rs. 2,000. Soham Ghosh of Semester IX was declared as the “Best Researcher” and received a medal, certificate, and a cash prize of Rs. 1,000.
Seminar on Revisiting the feminist lens
Name of the speakers/consultants/agencies involved: Dr. Zaid Al Baset, Assistant Professor, St. Xavier's College, Koyel Ghosh, Managing Trustee, Sappho for Equality.
Name of the Convenor: Dr. Debolina Chatterjee.
Date: 02-09-2024
A Seminar on ‘Revisiting the Feminist Lens’ was organized for 1st and 2nd year B.A LLB (Hons) students of Xavier Law School on 2nd September 2024. The invited speakers were Dr. Zaid Al Baset, Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Sociology, St. Xavier's College and Koyel Ghosh, Managing Trustee, Sappho for Equality.
Attendees: B.A LLB Semester 1 Section 1- 47; Section- 2-49; Section 3- 55;
B.A LLB Semester 3 Section 1- 49; Section 2-43; Section 3- 46
Total students - 289
There were faculty members who also were present or joined the event at various points in time.
About the Programme/event:
The programme began with a brief introduction of the seminar on ‘Revisiting the Feminist Lens’ by the emcee, Sujatro Sarkar, student of B.A LLB 2nd year. This was followed by welcoming both the speakers on the dais and presenting tokens of appreciation by the Professor-In-Charge of B.Com and B.A LLB respectively. Dr. Siddhant Chandra was called upon to introduce Dr. Zaid Al Baset, Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Sociology, St. Xavier's College, Kolkata. The topic of Dr. Baset’s lecture was Men and Feminist Endeavors. He engaged with the students by asking them about the term "mansplaining." He then discussed how Feminism is interdisciplinary, critical, humanist, and intersectional in nature. He raised the question as to what motivates men to engage with critical perspectives that seek to dismantle patriarchal structures. Using selected chapters from his co-authored book ‘Men and Feminism’, he presented four prominent responses of Sanjay Srivastava, Pushpesh Kumar, Oishik Sircar, and Srimati Basu to the question. He went on to show how the patriarchal and masculinist power structures suffocate real and potentially supportive men and discourage them from emerging as co-participants in feminist strategies. The key aspects of his deliberation spanned across the ramifications of patriarchal society, the journey towards feminism, how men can confront their own social histories, and making sense of the violence perpetrated by the so-called 'powerful' gender. He then went on to discuss what constitutes a valid male feminist standpoint. To conclude, Dr. Zaid highlighted the need for integrating feminist engagement in pedagogy and practice which is a practice of an ethic of responsibility. The emcee then called upon Dr. Dipparna Jana to introduce the second speaker, Koyel Ghosh, Managing Trustee, Sappho for Equality. Koyel Ghosh deliberated upon the topic of Gender Based Violence on Queer and Trans-persons by natal families and the need for alternative livelihoods for sustainable living of Queer and Transpersons. They began their discussion by sharing their personal experiences as a non-binary individual who was assigned female at birth. Koyel then discussed the narrative of violence against the LGBTQ+ community referring to several instances of suicide by such individuals as a result of rejection from their families and society at large. Koyel then discussed the Indian socio-cultural and legal context, covering various laws affecting LGBTQ+ individuals, such as the NALSA Judgment (2014), the Right to Privacy Act (2017), the partial reading down of Section 377 (2018), and the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act (2020). The discussion continued with an exploration of the concept of ‘home’ which is differently experienced by queer and transpersons. Additional topics of the presentation included different levels of violence, the challenges of finding temporary shelter and the matter of government allowances for queer and trans individuals. Through a video presentation, Koyel ended the lecture asserting the symbolism and significance of the “rainbow” or “pride” flag.
In the final segment of the programme, a question-and-answer session allowed students to engage with and ask questions to the speakers. This was followed by the speakers’ concluding remarks, summarizing their key insights and reflections on the seminar. In the end, Dr. Debolina Chatterjee, Assistant Professor of Sociology and Convener of the event, on behalf of the organizing committee which comprised Dr. Trisha Bakshi and Dr. Siddhant Chandra, delivered the vote of thanks and concluded the programme.
Attendees: B.A LLB Semester 1 Section 1- 47; Section- 2-49; Section 3- 55;
B.A LLB Semester 3 Section 1- 49; Section 2-43; Section 3- 46
Total students - 289
There were faculty members who also were present or joined the event at various points in time.
About the Programme/event:
The programme began with a brief introduction of the seminar on ‘Revisiting the Feminist Lens’ by the emcee, Sujatro Sarkar, student of B.A LLB 2nd year. This was followed by welcoming both the speakers on the dais and presenting tokens of appreciation by the Professor-In-Charge of B.Com and B.A LLB respectively. Dr. Siddhant Chandra was called upon to introduce Dr. Zaid Al Baset, Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Sociology, St. Xavier's College, Kolkata. The topic of Dr. Baset’s lecture was Men and Feminist Endeavors. He engaged with the students by asking them about the term "mansplaining." He then discussed how Feminism is interdisciplinary, critical, humanist, and intersectional in nature. He raised the question as to what motivates men to engage with critical perspectives that seek to dismantle patriarchal structures. Using selected chapters from his co-authored book ‘Men and Feminism’, he presented four prominent responses of Sanjay Srivastava, Pushpesh Kumar, Oishik Sircar, and Srimati Basu to the question. He went on to show how the patriarchal and masculinist power structures suffocate real and potentially supportive men and discourage them from emerging as co-participants in feminist strategies. The key aspects of his deliberation spanned across the ramifications of patriarchal society, the journey towards feminism, how men can confront their own social histories, and making sense of the violence perpetrated by the so-called 'powerful' gender. He then went on to discuss what constitutes a valid male feminist standpoint. To conclude, Dr. Zaid highlighted the need for integrating feminist engagement in pedagogy and practice which is a practice of an ethic of responsibility. The emcee then called upon Dr. Dipparna Jana to introduce the second speaker, Koyel Ghosh, Managing Trustee, Sappho for Equality. Koyel Ghosh deliberated upon the topic of Gender Based Violence on Queer and Trans-persons by natal families and the need for alternative livelihoods for sustainable living of Queer and Transpersons. They began their discussion by sharing their personal experiences as a non-binary individual who was assigned female at birth. Koyel then discussed the narrative of violence against the LGBTQ+ community referring to several instances of suicide by such individuals as a result of rejection from their families and society at large. Koyel then discussed the Indian socio-cultural and legal context, covering various laws affecting LGBTQ+ individuals, such as the NALSA Judgment (2014), the Right to Privacy Act (2017), the partial reading down of Section 377 (2018), and the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act (2020). The discussion continued with an exploration of the concept of ‘home’ which is differently experienced by queer and transpersons. Additional topics of the presentation included different levels of violence, the challenges of finding temporary shelter and the matter of government allowances for queer and trans individuals. Through a video presentation, Koyel ended the lecture asserting the symbolism and significance of the “rainbow” or “pride” flag.
In the final segment of the programme, a question-and-answer session allowed students to engage with and ask questions to the speakers. This was followed by the speakers’ concluding remarks, summarizing their key insights and reflections on the seminar. In the end, Dr. Debolina Chatterjee, Assistant Professor of Sociology and Convener of the event, on behalf of the organizing committee which comprised Dr. Trisha Bakshi and Dr. Siddhant Chandra, delivered the vote of thanks and concluded the programme.
Safe Digital Journey
Name of the speakers/consultants/agencies involved: Participating Schools: Narayana School, Park Circus Claret School, Sahibganj St. Xavier's School, Sahibganj Auxilium Convent School, Barasat Our Lady Queen of the Mission School, Salt Lake Ashok Hall Girls's Highjer Secondary Schhol Sri Chaitanya Techno School
Name of the Convenor: Ajitesh Prasad.
Date: 30-08-2024
St. Xavier's University, Kolkata, hosted a workshop titled "Navigating Career Choices: Effective Decision-Making Strategies" for 28 students from St. Xavier's School, Sahibganj. The workshop aimed to equip students with the tools and knowledge needed to make informed decisions about their future careers.
The workshop was designed to provide students with an in-depth understanding of various career opportunities across multiple fields. Through interactive sessions, students were encouraged to explore different career paths and consider factors such as personal interests, strengths, and market demand when making their decisions.
Key Topics Covered:
1. Overview of Career Options: A comprehensive introduction to a wide range of careers that students can opt for.
2. Effective Decision-Making Strategies: Techniques for making informed career choices, including self-assessment, research, and the importance of seeking guidance from mentors and professionals in the field.
3. Future Trends and Opportunities: Insights into the evolving job market and the skills required to thrive in future careers.
Q & A Session: The workshop concluded with a dynamic Q&A session, where students had the opportunity to ask questions and seek advice from the panellist comprising of professors from each department of St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata. This session allowed for personalized guidance, addressing the students' specific concerns and aspirations.
Impact and Feedback: The students of St. Xavier's School, Sahibganj, found the workshop to be highly informative and relevant to their current stage in life. The session provided them with clarity and confidence in making career-related decisions, setting them on a path toward achieving their professional goals.
The workshop was designed to provide students with an in-depth understanding of various career opportunities across multiple fields. Through interactive sessions, students were encouraged to explore different career paths and consider factors such as personal interests, strengths, and market demand when making their decisions.
Key Topics Covered:
1. Overview of Career Options: A comprehensive introduction to a wide range of careers that students can opt for.
2. Effective Decision-Making Strategies: Techniques for making informed career choices, including self-assessment, research, and the importance of seeking guidance from mentors and professionals in the field.
3. Future Trends and Opportunities: Insights into the evolving job market and the skills required to thrive in future careers.
Q & A Session: The workshop concluded with a dynamic Q&A session, where students had the opportunity to ask questions and seek advice from the panellist comprising of professors from each department of St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata. This session allowed for personalized guidance, addressing the students' specific concerns and aspirations.
Impact and Feedback: The students of St. Xavier's School, Sahibganj, found the workshop to be highly informative and relevant to their current stage in life. The session provided them with clarity and confidence in making career-related decisions, setting them on a path toward achieving their professional goals.
Panel Discussion on "Decoding the BNS, BNSS & BSA
Name of the speakers/consultants/agencies involved: Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay, Chief Law Instructor, Kolkata Police Training Academy, Shri Soumyajit Raha, Special Public Prosecutor, CID West Bengal, Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan,Associate Professor of Law, WBNUJS, Kolkata, Shri Sanjay Banerjee, Assistant Public Prosecutor, Dr. Jyoti Puri Chatterjee, Guest Faculty of Law
Name of the Convenor: Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah.
Date: 24-08-2024
The Xavier’s Law School, on behalf of St. Xavier’s University, at the initiation of the Criminal law Honours students on 24th August 2024 had organized a panel discussion on the newly enforced Criminal Laws namely- The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita(BNS), the Bharatiya Saksya Adhiniyam(BSA) and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) which replaced the classical Indian Penal Code 1860, the Indian Evidence Act1872 and the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 respectively. Convened by Asst. Prof. Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah, the event was panelled by the gracious presence of Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay ( Chief Law Instructor at Kolkata Police Training Academy), Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan(Associate professor at WBNUJS), Shri Sanjay Banerjee (Assistant Public Prosecutor), Shri Soumyajit Raha (Special Public Prosecutor) and Dr. Jyoti Puri (Senior Guest faculty of law).
After the opening lines delivered by the emcees, the Ld. Dean of Xavier’s Law School, Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee in her inaugural address acknowledged the contribution of the convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah and briefly introduced the theme of the panel discussion. Thereafter the dignitaries were facilitated with a token of appreciation on behalf of the Xavier’s Law School. The discussion was then opened by the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah, with the fundamental question whether the new laws have shun away the colonial hangover or is it still in force.
Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay, in response said that the change is for the positive in the BSA as the word ‘evidence ‘ itself is derived from the Latin word ‘evidere ‘ which means to show clearly or to make it clear. Thereafter he mentioned the inconsistencies between Sec. 114 illustration (b) (which provides that the testimony of an accomplice is unworthy of credit) and Sec. 133 ( which provides that the testimony of the accomplice can be worthy when corroborated with other evidence) of the I.E.A and sighted Sec.138 of B.S.A which marks the ‘positive change’ by striking a balance between the two. He concluded saying “The changes made are for the positive’’.
Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan then addressed the question of the Convenor as to far the new laws have helped the victim in access to justice and whether the B.S.A still has the colonial hangover. He began by stating that words used in the I.E.A like the ‘Crown’ and others really did create a colonial hangover. He mentioned the structure, content and the heart and soul of the B.S.A has remained similar to that of I.E.A. Though the scope of Sec 6. Res Gestae I.E.A, which is an exception to the hearsay rule , does not extend to the full chapter of ‘relevancy of facts’, he remarked that there is an improvement in the new law. Furthermore, he said that since B.S.A has the least structural changes. Mere deletion of a few words from a statute does not remove the colonial hangover and that it has technically not done away with it. With the improvements made, a full proof system was aimed at, focusing on the electronic aspect. There are various forms like the Form A, Form B, which applies for both the civil and criminal cases and which are not easy for a normal citizen to fill. While appreciating the concept of ‘E- F.I.R', he pointed out that it has hurdles the victims to access justice as Sec.173(3) of B.N.S.S provides that the police may refuse to register an F.I.R after having ascertained whether there is evidence of the allegation. “The B.N.S.S has not done justice to the poor for access to justice"- he remarked. He continued by saying that previously also we could see that the police did not wanted to register an F.I.R, now he can legally refuse the same. Even if it is a complaint to the Magistrate (S.A Report), the Magistrate before he can take cognizance of the matter has to hear the accused. “Influential people can easily manage anything’’- he said. “Now let us hear from the practitioners"- said the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah, taking the discussion forward. Shri Sanjay Banerjee takes up the discussion by first addressing the concept of ‘colonialism’ i.e., A system where the master tries to suppress the voice of the servant. He observed that the constitution of India already mentions that “India that is Bharat…”, so there was no actual need to change the term ‘India’ to ‘Bharat’. In the context of Zero F.I.R, he said “The provisions of registering an FIR out of jurisdiction has been added but the remedy upon refusal remains the same i.e. Going to the S.P, with the jurisdiction not specific”. He also mentioned about the Lalita Kumar’s case in this context. Thus by transliteration of the old acts makes the fact abundantly clear that the colonial hangover is still in force. He criticised Sec.150 of the B.N.S.S - the provisions empowering the police with the power of ‘attaching the property’ by rhetorical question whether the police can do so even before the offender is proved guilty. Finally, sighting the ‘Bulldozer Justice’ he exclaimed that the law on one hand gives power to the police and curtains the right of the accused. He observed that that offences which already existed under the I.P.C has now been given a fancy name in the B.N.S. The Convenor then draws the attention towards the development of the Unlawful Assembly (Prevention Act) i.e. U.A.P.A, questioning the fate of the offenses encompassing both the special and the general statutes and cited the example of ‘terrorism’. “The devil lies in the details"- answered Shri Soumyajit Raha while Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan casted light on the Malimath Committee recommendation 2002. Driving us through the lanes of his memory lane, he shared that while he was still a student , he had witnessed the recommendation being drafted which suggested the categorization of the offenses as ‘arrestable and non arrestable' rather than ‘cognizable and non cognizable offenses’. He also cited the Rita Kumari’s judgement in this regard. “Are we then heading towards a Police State?” -asked the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah, in light of the case ‘Prem Shankar Shukla V. Delhi Administration’. Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay while answering, remarked that since it is a welfare state, we are not leading to a Police state. Moreover, in certain cases denying the Sunil Batra judgement, handcuff becomes necessary. Thereafter upon the request of the Convenor, Shri Soumyajit Raha shares his views saying that though this Amendment has created a benchmark in definition ‘Primary evidence ‘ and ‘Secondary evidence’ in the digital era, the law was actually not required to be changed but merely amended. Furthermore, he added that in this digital era, it is not desirable to handover the mobile phone to the police for investigation, where the screenshot serves as a ‘primary evidence ‘ . “No requirement of putting old wine into new bottle"- he remarked. Most essentially, the hash value generated u/s 63(4)(c) is technically a difficult process for a layman not being a technological expert. We then hear about the perils of the Police in dealing with the technologically advanced process where the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah adds saying that the register should also be maintained. He mentioned about the Abdul Khalid case in this context. Considering that there are very little checks and balances in this regard, the law could have made the investigation and the law and order wing different as this would improve the quality of investigation. He touched on the points of Zero F.I.R, more power to the police which were already discussed by the other panellists. Thereafter upon the request the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah, Dr. Jyoti Puri sheds Light in this regard highlighting the inconsistencies between Sec.167(3) of Cr.Pc and Sec.187(3) of the B.N.S.S. “Truncated remand has curtailed the freedom to apply for bail"- she states. Despite the fact that Sec. 145 of the Military Act does not define ‘unbecoming conduct ‘ and similarly ‘Modesty’ not defined anywhere in the I.P.C or B.N.S, it is true that the new law is a victim oriented law, as the victim gets the update of the investigation. However, the new legislation seems to have abstained from encompassing burning issues like the marital rape, abortion, as a codified offense. She stated that the term “modesty of a woman is a very vague term’’ and that the new laws have been made very hastily since the legislature should have put more heart and soul while making the new laws.
Finally, the discussion concludes in a merry spirit as Sanjay Banerjee sights several provisions where erroneously classical obsolete words have been accorded, including Sec. 30 illustration (c) of B.N.S uses the word ‘trepan', sec. 100 illustration (c), sec. 101 illustration (d), Sec 129 illustration (b) and (c), sec 217 illustration (b), Sec 303 illustration (c), etc.
The Question-answer Round: As the floor gets opened for the students interaction, “What is the remedy if after refusal from the Police, even the Magistrate refuses to take cognizance?”-asks a student. Shri Sanjay Banerjee takes up the question as he answers that Magistrate can monitor the investigation in light of the case of Sakiri Bano V. State of UP. This leads us to another question from the other side of the hall as another student questions the existence of ‘Fast Track Courts ‘ as there are cases languishing for 32 years. “Justice delayed is Justice denied indeed"- exclaims Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan as he answers the question. He sights a few other cases like ‘Raju Sharma Case 1999’ which had a reversed judgement, ‘Ramachandran Rao Case 2000’ and the celebrated judgement of ‘A.R Antuley where the Supreme Court had set aside the technical jargon for a speedy trial. He states that Right to speedy trial is not only the right of the victim but also the accused. Shri Sanjay Banerjee then shares his experience of dealing with cases languishing for an unreasonable period of time. “Is the offense of rape gender neutral? “- asks another student. To this, Shri Sanjay Banerjee explains that though the intent of the new legislation is to make offenses gender neutral, charge of rape cannot be imposed on a woman as she is not encompassed within the ingredients of the offense. We hear from Shri Soumyajit Raha as he develops the narrative in light of ‘Venu Goenka V. State of West Bengal’ along with the case of ‘Sayantan Chatterjee V. State of West Bengal ‘ as he explains the problem concluding that this is still a grey area of law.
Up next another student comes up with a bifurcated question, the first being in light of interpreting Sec.9 of the Indian Evidence Act and corresponding Sec.7 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, as to whether an illegally collected evidence is an admissible piece of evidence. Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan then enlightens us saying that “Since the statute provides that any fact, the disclosure of which is necessary, it may be relevant and admissible if the Court may deem fit". He elaborates further as he sights Sec. 61 and Sec. 63 of the B.S.A and then drawing the nexus to Sec . 27 B.S.A. As he cites the case of ‘Salim Sarabjit' and ‘Madhav Menon Case', the celebrated Prakash Singh judgement also finds its place in the discussion. Thereafter the second part of the question is put forward as she requests Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay, to cast some light on the Malimath Committee Report 2002 which suggested to reform the Police Act 1861 as the police play a pivotal role in the Criminal Justice System. In the concurring opinion of Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay we learn that there is a demand in the Police Department to segregate the investigation wing from the law and order wing.
The debate of ‘Equality before law and equal protection in law’ then finds room in the discussion with the question of another student which is answered by Shri Sanjay Banerjee and Dr. Jyoti Puri as they unanimously explained the Constitutional provision in the light of the trial. “Equality among the equals and you cannot treat the unequal equally’’ stated Rajkumar sir in this context.
The incident of street brutality in U.P is then drawn up as another student question the lawful power of the police. Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay addresses this saying that there should be more checks on the power of the police. “However we should abide by the statute as police is the law enforcement agency of the Government “.
The Covenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah then brings us back to the fundamental question as to whether the laws have been decolonized or is it still in force. To this the hall shakes with the roaring voice of the students unanimously saying “No".
The curtains are finally drawn with the vote of thanks delivered by the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah as he concludes saying “The debate is perennial and it would require time to adapt". This suggests that though we are technically out of the colonial hangover, the classical ghost still haunts the Criminal Justice System. This brings us to the conclusion that despite many advents of reform in the Criminal Justice System, certain grey areas are still to be filled. We are grateful to the law makers and the Legal thinkers for their construction and what void remains would be certainly filled by the students of law.
Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay, in response said that the change is for the positive in the BSA as the word ‘evidence ‘ itself is derived from the Latin word ‘evidere ‘ which means to show clearly or to make it clear. Thereafter he mentioned the inconsistencies between Sec. 114 illustration (b) (which provides that the testimony of an accomplice is unworthy of credit) and Sec. 133 ( which provides that the testimony of the accomplice can be worthy when corroborated with other evidence) of the I.E.A and sighted Sec.138 of B.S.A which marks the ‘positive change’ by striking a balance between the two. He concluded saying “The changes made are for the positive’’.
Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan then addressed the question of the Convenor as to far the new laws have helped the victim in access to justice and whether the B.S.A still has the colonial hangover. He began by stating that words used in the I.E.A like the ‘Crown’ and others really did create a colonial hangover. He mentioned the structure, content and the heart and soul of the B.S.A has remained similar to that of I.E.A. Though the scope of Sec 6. Res Gestae I.E.A, which is an exception to the hearsay rule , does not extend to the full chapter of ‘relevancy of facts’, he remarked that there is an improvement in the new law. Furthermore, he said that since B.S.A has the least structural changes. Mere deletion of a few words from a statute does not remove the colonial hangover and that it has technically not done away with it. With the improvements made, a full proof system was aimed at, focusing on the electronic aspect. There are various forms like the Form A, Form B, which applies for both the civil and criminal cases and which are not easy for a normal citizen to fill. While appreciating the concept of ‘E- F.I.R', he pointed out that it has hurdles the victims to access justice as Sec.173(3) of B.N.S.S provides that the police may refuse to register an F.I.R after having ascertained whether there is evidence of the allegation. “The B.N.S.S has not done justice to the poor for access to justice"- he remarked. He continued by saying that previously also we could see that the police did not wanted to register an F.I.R, now he can legally refuse the same. Even if it is a complaint to the Magistrate (S.A Report), the Magistrate before he can take cognizance of the matter has to hear the accused. “Influential people can easily manage anything’’- he said. “Now let us hear from the practitioners"- said the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah, taking the discussion forward. Shri Sanjay Banerjee takes up the discussion by first addressing the concept of ‘colonialism’ i.e., A system where the master tries to suppress the voice of the servant. He observed that the constitution of India already mentions that “India that is Bharat…”, so there was no actual need to change the term ‘India’ to ‘Bharat’. In the context of Zero F.I.R, he said “The provisions of registering an FIR out of jurisdiction has been added but the remedy upon refusal remains the same i.e. Going to the S.P, with the jurisdiction not specific”. He also mentioned about the Lalita Kumar’s case in this context. Thus by transliteration of the old acts makes the fact abundantly clear that the colonial hangover is still in force. He criticised Sec.150 of the B.N.S.S - the provisions empowering the police with the power of ‘attaching the property’ by rhetorical question whether the police can do so even before the offender is proved guilty. Finally, sighting the ‘Bulldozer Justice’ he exclaimed that the law on one hand gives power to the police and curtains the right of the accused. He observed that that offences which already existed under the I.P.C has now been given a fancy name in the B.N.S. The Convenor then draws the attention towards the development of the Unlawful Assembly (Prevention Act) i.e. U.A.P.A, questioning the fate of the offenses encompassing both the special and the general statutes and cited the example of ‘terrorism’. “The devil lies in the details"- answered Shri Soumyajit Raha while Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan casted light on the Malimath Committee recommendation 2002. Driving us through the lanes of his memory lane, he shared that while he was still a student , he had witnessed the recommendation being drafted which suggested the categorization of the offenses as ‘arrestable and non arrestable' rather than ‘cognizable and non cognizable offenses’. He also cited the Rita Kumari’s judgement in this regard. “Are we then heading towards a Police State?” -asked the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah, in light of the case ‘Prem Shankar Shukla V. Delhi Administration’. Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay while answering, remarked that since it is a welfare state, we are not leading to a Police state. Moreover, in certain cases denying the Sunil Batra judgement, handcuff becomes necessary. Thereafter upon the request of the Convenor, Shri Soumyajit Raha shares his views saying that though this Amendment has created a benchmark in definition ‘Primary evidence ‘ and ‘Secondary evidence’ in the digital era, the law was actually not required to be changed but merely amended. Furthermore, he added that in this digital era, it is not desirable to handover the mobile phone to the police for investigation, where the screenshot serves as a ‘primary evidence ‘ . “No requirement of putting old wine into new bottle"- he remarked. Most essentially, the hash value generated u/s 63(4)(c) is technically a difficult process for a layman not being a technological expert. We then hear about the perils of the Police in dealing with the technologically advanced process where the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah adds saying that the register should also be maintained. He mentioned about the Abdul Khalid case in this context. Considering that there are very little checks and balances in this regard, the law could have made the investigation and the law and order wing different as this would improve the quality of investigation. He touched on the points of Zero F.I.R, more power to the police which were already discussed by the other panellists. Thereafter upon the request the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah, Dr. Jyoti Puri sheds Light in this regard highlighting the inconsistencies between Sec.167(3) of Cr.Pc and Sec.187(3) of the B.N.S.S. “Truncated remand has curtailed the freedom to apply for bail"- she states. Despite the fact that Sec. 145 of the Military Act does not define ‘unbecoming conduct ‘ and similarly ‘Modesty’ not defined anywhere in the I.P.C or B.N.S, it is true that the new law is a victim oriented law, as the victim gets the update of the investigation. However, the new legislation seems to have abstained from encompassing burning issues like the marital rape, abortion, as a codified offense. She stated that the term “modesty of a woman is a very vague term’’ and that the new laws have been made very hastily since the legislature should have put more heart and soul while making the new laws.
Finally, the discussion concludes in a merry spirit as Sanjay Banerjee sights several provisions where erroneously classical obsolete words have been accorded, including Sec. 30 illustration (c) of B.N.S uses the word ‘trepan', sec. 100 illustration (c), sec. 101 illustration (d), Sec 129 illustration (b) and (c), sec 217 illustration (b), Sec 303 illustration (c), etc.
The Question-answer Round: As the floor gets opened for the students interaction, “What is the remedy if after refusal from the Police, even the Magistrate refuses to take cognizance?”-asks a student. Shri Sanjay Banerjee takes up the question as he answers that Magistrate can monitor the investigation in light of the case of Sakiri Bano V. State of UP. This leads us to another question from the other side of the hall as another student questions the existence of ‘Fast Track Courts ‘ as there are cases languishing for 32 years. “Justice delayed is Justice denied indeed"- exclaims Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan as he answers the question. He sights a few other cases like ‘Raju Sharma Case 1999’ which had a reversed judgement, ‘Ramachandran Rao Case 2000’ and the celebrated judgement of ‘A.R Antuley where the Supreme Court had set aside the technical jargon for a speedy trial. He states that Right to speedy trial is not only the right of the victim but also the accused. Shri Sanjay Banerjee then shares his experience of dealing with cases languishing for an unreasonable period of time. “Is the offense of rape gender neutral? “- asks another student. To this, Shri Sanjay Banerjee explains that though the intent of the new legislation is to make offenses gender neutral, charge of rape cannot be imposed on a woman as she is not encompassed within the ingredients of the offense. We hear from Shri Soumyajit Raha as he develops the narrative in light of ‘Venu Goenka V. State of West Bengal’ along with the case of ‘Sayantan Chatterjee V. State of West Bengal ‘ as he explains the problem concluding that this is still a grey area of law.
Up next another student comes up with a bifurcated question, the first being in light of interpreting Sec.9 of the Indian Evidence Act and corresponding Sec.7 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, as to whether an illegally collected evidence is an admissible piece of evidence. Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan then enlightens us saying that “Since the statute provides that any fact, the disclosure of which is necessary, it may be relevant and admissible if the Court may deem fit". He elaborates further as he sights Sec. 61 and Sec. 63 of the B.S.A and then drawing the nexus to Sec . 27 B.S.A. As he cites the case of ‘Salim Sarabjit' and ‘Madhav Menon Case', the celebrated Prakash Singh judgement also finds its place in the discussion. Thereafter the second part of the question is put forward as she requests Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay, to cast some light on the Malimath Committee Report 2002 which suggested to reform the Police Act 1861 as the police play a pivotal role in the Criminal Justice System. In the concurring opinion of Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay we learn that there is a demand in the Police Department to segregate the investigation wing from the law and order wing.
The debate of ‘Equality before law and equal protection in law’ then finds room in the discussion with the question of another student which is answered by Shri Sanjay Banerjee and Dr. Jyoti Puri as they unanimously explained the Constitutional provision in the light of the trial. “Equality among the equals and you cannot treat the unequal equally’’ stated Rajkumar sir in this context.
The incident of street brutality in U.P is then drawn up as another student question the lawful power of the police. Shri Rajkumar Bandyopadhyay addresses this saying that there should be more checks on the power of the police. “However we should abide by the statute as police is the law enforcement agency of the Government “.
The Covenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah then brings us back to the fundamental question as to whether the laws have been decolonized or is it still in force. To this the hall shakes with the roaring voice of the students unanimously saying “No".
The curtains are finally drawn with the vote of thanks delivered by the Convenor Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah as he concludes saying “The debate is perennial and it would require time to adapt". This suggests that though we are technically out of the colonial hangover, the classical ghost still haunts the Criminal Justice System. This brings us to the conclusion that despite many advents of reform in the Criminal Justice System, certain grey areas are still to be filled. We are grateful to the law makers and the Legal thinkers for their construction and what void remains would be certainly filled by the students of law.
6th Foundation Day Programme and 4th Edition of Discorsio (Xavier Law School Study Circle)
Name of the speakers/consultants/agencies involved: Dr. Shouvik Kumar Guha (Associate Professor of Law, The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata), Mr. Suvankar Dasgupta (Filmmaker and Lecturer of Sociology, Sonarpur Mahavidyalaya), Prof. (Dr.) Ashok Kumar Mohapatra (Professor, Department of English, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata), Dr. Sithara Puli Venkatesh (Assistant Professor, Department of Mass Communication, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata) and Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh (Associate Professor of Law, Xavier Law School, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata)
Name of the Convenor:Prof. Ratul Das
Date: 02-08-2024
On 2nd August,2024, Xavier Law School proudly celebrated its 6th Foundation Day, marking another milestone in its illustrious history. The event was marked with the 4th Edition of Discorsio (Xavier Law School Study Circle) in a 5-phase event celebrating the theatricality of law. The session was conducted at in collaboration with Moot Court Society, Xavier Law School (MCS) and Xavier Society of Law and Justice (XSLAJ), and was held at Fr. Albert Huart Hall, Fr. Arrupe Central Library Building. The proceedings were also live streamed in several classrooms of the School in the Academic Building simultaneously. The event was filled with reflections on the school's achievements, and a renewed commitment to excellence in legal education.
The day commenced with an opening ceremony, ‘AAROHAN’, in the presence of Prof. Ashis Mitra, Registrar, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata, Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee, Dean, Xavier Law School, members of the faculty and alumni, students and esteemed guests.
The event commenced with the welcome address from Prof. Ratul Das, the Convener of Discorsio, followed by the inaugural Address by Prof. Ashis Mitra, who highlighted the department’s journey since its inception and the significant strides it has made ever since.
The event featured a vibrant cultural program showcasing the diverse talents of the students which featured musical performances through song and dance, showcasing various socio-legal experiences in our society and expressed our aspirations and imaginations in law and justice.
In the next segment, The Trial, the critically acclaimed movie Anatomy of a Fall (Justin Triet, 2023) was screened, which follows the death of Mr. Samuel Maleski and the trial of his wife Sandra Voyter in connection to the murder.
The film also served as an experiential moot proposition, paving the way for the third segment of the event, The Appeal, where the winning team of Xavier Intra XLS Trial & Advocacy Competition 2023 and the winning team of XavJudice 2024 (Xavier’s Intra XLS Moot Court Competition) faced each other in an appellate jury Proceeding based on the film's central case. This performance was presided over by a Jury comprising of Dr. Shouvik Kumar Guha (Associate Professor of Law, The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata), Mr. Suvankar Dasgupta (Filmmaker and Lecturer of Sociology, Sonarpur Mahavidyalaya), Prof. (Dr.) Ashok Kumar Mohapatra (Professor, Department of English, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata), Dr. Sithara Puli Venkatesh (Assistant Professor, Department of Mass Communication, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata) and Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh (Associate Professor of Law, Xavier Law School, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata).
Following this, in the fourth segment of the event, The Verdict, the Jurors engaged in a panel discussion facilitated by Mr. Ayush Majumdar (Student, B.A.LL.B. (Honours) 5th Semester, Xavier Law School), deliberating into the evidence presented during the proceeding also debating legal points from multidisciplinary perspectives and provided insights on the intricacies of jury proceedings. The Jurors were then felicitated by Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee, the Dean of Xavier Law School, which was followed by the felicitation of the student participants representing the Appellants and the Respondents during The Appeal, by Dr. Animesh Das, the Convener of XSLAJ, and Dr. Rajrupa Sinha Roy, the convener of MCS, respectively. Following this, a celebration cake was cut by the Jurors and members of the faculty and alumni to mark the 5th anniversary of the inauguration of the School.
In final segment of the event, ‘AVROHAN’, students of Xavier Law School delivered another melodious musical performance. Following this, Dr. Krishna Roy, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Barjora College, Bankura, who was a founding faculty member of the School, addressed the audience with a special concluding note to the day’s celebrations. Prof. Ratul Das felicitated her with a token of gratitude from the School in appreciation of her contribution to its establishment and growth. The event was formally concluded by the delivery of the vote of thanks by Mr. Amogh Mukhopadhyay, Student, B.Com.LL.B. (Honours) 7th Semester, Xavier Law School. It was a day of reflection, inspiration, and celebration, and of reinforcing the values that Xavier Law School stands for.
The day commenced with an opening ceremony, ‘AAROHAN’, in the presence of Prof. Ashis Mitra, Registrar, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata, Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee, Dean, Xavier Law School, members of the faculty and alumni, students and esteemed guests.
The event commenced with the welcome address from Prof. Ratul Das, the Convener of Discorsio, followed by the inaugural Address by Prof. Ashis Mitra, who highlighted the department’s journey since its inception and the significant strides it has made ever since.
The event featured a vibrant cultural program showcasing the diverse talents of the students which featured musical performances through song and dance, showcasing various socio-legal experiences in our society and expressed our aspirations and imaginations in law and justice.
In the next segment, The Trial, the critically acclaimed movie Anatomy of a Fall (Justin Triet, 2023) was screened, which follows the death of Mr. Samuel Maleski and the trial of his wife Sandra Voyter in connection to the murder.
The film also served as an experiential moot proposition, paving the way for the third segment of the event, The Appeal, where the winning team of Xavier Intra XLS Trial & Advocacy Competition 2023 and the winning team of XavJudice 2024 (Xavier’s Intra XLS Moot Court Competition) faced each other in an appellate jury Proceeding based on the film's central case. This performance was presided over by a Jury comprising of Dr. Shouvik Kumar Guha (Associate Professor of Law, The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata), Mr. Suvankar Dasgupta (Filmmaker and Lecturer of Sociology, Sonarpur Mahavidyalaya), Prof. (Dr.) Ashok Kumar Mohapatra (Professor, Department of English, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata), Dr. Sithara Puli Venkatesh (Assistant Professor, Department of Mass Communication, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata) and Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh (Associate Professor of Law, Xavier Law School, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata).
Following this, in the fourth segment of the event, The Verdict, the Jurors engaged in a panel discussion facilitated by Mr. Ayush Majumdar (Student, B.A.LL.B. (Honours) 5th Semester, Xavier Law School), deliberating into the evidence presented during the proceeding also debating legal points from multidisciplinary perspectives and provided insights on the intricacies of jury proceedings. The Jurors were then felicitated by Dr. Ranjeeta Mukherjee, the Dean of Xavier Law School, which was followed by the felicitation of the student participants representing the Appellants and the Respondents during The Appeal, by Dr. Animesh Das, the Convener of XSLAJ, and Dr. Rajrupa Sinha Roy, the convener of MCS, respectively. Following this, a celebration cake was cut by the Jurors and members of the faculty and alumni to mark the 5th anniversary of the inauguration of the School.
In final segment of the event, ‘AVROHAN’, students of Xavier Law School delivered another melodious musical performance. Following this, Dr. Krishna Roy, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Barjora College, Bankura, who was a founding faculty member of the School, addressed the audience with a special concluding note to the day’s celebrations. Prof. Ratul Das felicitated her with a token of gratitude from the School in appreciation of her contribution to its establishment and growth. The event was formally concluded by the delivery of the vote of thanks by Mr. Amogh Mukhopadhyay, Student, B.Com.LL.B. (Honours) 7th Semester, Xavier Law School. It was a day of reflection, inspiration, and celebration, and of reinforcing the values that Xavier Law School stands for.
Rise and Lead: Young Women Pioneering Technology, Business & Public Life
Name of the speakers/consultants/agencies involved: Mrs. Meenakshi Negi, Member Secretary of the National Commision for Women, Ministry of Women and Child Development, New Delhi, Rev. Father Maria Joseph Israel, Mrs. Amrita Dutta, IFS and Dr. (h.c) CSAdv. Mamta Binani
Name of the Convenor:Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh
Date: 03-05-2024
Xavier Law School, St. Xavier's University, Kolkata Hosts "Rise and Lead: Young Women Pioneering Technology, Business and Public Life" Program for Young Women.
Xavier Law School, St. Xavier's University, Kolkata (SXUK) collaborated with the National Commission for Women (NCW), Ministry of Women and Child Development, New Delhi to host an awareness and capacity building program titled "Rise and Lead: Young Women Pioneering Technology, Business and Public Life" on May 3rd, 2024 [Friday]. The program was successfully conducted by the organizing Committee consisting of the Convenor, Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Joint-convenors -Dr. Pratyusha Das and Dr. Gitu Singh and Co-Convenors- Dr. Asif Iqubal Shah and Rajdip Bhadra Chowdhury. The program featured eminent speakers including Mrs Meenakshi Negi, Member Secretary of National Commission for Women, Ministry of Women and Child Development, New Delhi, Rev. Father Maria Joseph Israel, Mrs. Amrita Dutta IFS, and Dr.(h.c)CS Adv. Mamta Binani.
The session commenced with the felicitations by Hon’ble Rev. Father Vice Chancellor, SXUK and Dean, Xavier Law School to the esteemed speakers followed by inaugural address delivered by Hon’ble Rev. Father Vice Chancellor, SXUK. Rev Father encouraged and motivated the participants with a story when a woman was chased by a group of men as they caught her in adultery and she kept on running to save herself from these men because they wanted to punish her by pelting stones on her. She then stood as she was spotted by a young gentleman. The gentleman who was helping the women addressed to the group of men who wanted to punish her that if anyone amongst them has not committed a sin can throw a stone at her. By this he saw that no one was there anymore and the man advised the women to be a joyful and told not to commit anymore sin in future.
Focus on Technology and Public Participation
The sessions highlighted the importance of women's participation in technology, business, and public life. Mrs Meenakshi Negi, Member Secretary, National Commission for Women emphasized the need for women in these sectors and shared stories to illustrate the value women bring to the table. She explained to us that the three sectors where women are highly welcomed by National Commission for Women to participate and these are also the sectors where only fewer women are represented like:
1. Technology 2. Women in public life 3. Corporates Education and Skill Development Rev. Father Maria Joseph Israel S.J. discussed the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Drone technology, highlighting India's role as a drone hub and the success stories of women drone pilots. Rev. Father started by quoting Dr. James Emman Kwegyir Aggrey, a Canadian educationist and Scholar who said " If you educate a man, you educate an individual, but if you educate a woman, you educate the whole Nation." He stressed the importance of education, skill development, and gender equality.
Breaking Barriers for Women in Leadership Mrs Amrita Dutta, IFS addressed the challenges women face in decision-making roles, such as stereotypes, work-life balance, and societal conditioning. "One is not born but becomes a woman" i.e. the society teaches her how to become a woman. She presented solutions like quota systems, increased education access, and promoting work-life balance policies. However, the most important of all is to inculcate humanity within ourselves.
Women in Corporate Boards Dr. Mamta Binani addressed the issue of women's representation on corporate boards. She encouraged women to be persistent and highlighted the value of experience. Ma'am drew an analogy between the job opportunities that we have, i.e, the size of the cake and the people with whom we compete, i.e, the number of people with whom I will need to share the cake. She said that the number of opportunities shall always be more and shall always go up so much so that we never care about the people with whom we have to compete.
Open Questions and Answers Session and Vote of thanks There was an open question and answer session, encouraging young women to pursue their goals. The speakers emphasized the importance of breaking stereotypes, acquiring skills, and advocated for gender equality. The program concluded with vote of thanks given by Convenor of the program Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Associate Professor, Xavier Law School, St. Xaviers University, Kolkata. The program witnessed a participation of about 200 students from Xavier Law School.
The sessions highlighted the importance of women's participation in technology, business, and public life. Mrs Meenakshi Negi, Member Secretary, National Commission for Women emphasized the need for women in these sectors and shared stories to illustrate the value women bring to the table. She explained to us that the three sectors where women are highly welcomed by National Commission for Women to participate and these are also the sectors where only fewer women are represented like:
1. Technology 2. Women in public life 3. Corporates Education and Skill Development Rev. Father Maria Joseph Israel S.J. discussed the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Drone technology, highlighting India's role as a drone hub and the success stories of women drone pilots. Rev. Father started by quoting Dr. James Emman Kwegyir Aggrey, a Canadian educationist and Scholar who said " If you educate a man, you educate an individual, but if you educate a woman, you educate the whole Nation." He stressed the importance of education, skill development, and gender equality.
Breaking Barriers for Women in Leadership Mrs Amrita Dutta, IFS addressed the challenges women face in decision-making roles, such as stereotypes, work-life balance, and societal conditioning. "One is not born but becomes a woman" i.e. the society teaches her how to become a woman. She presented solutions like quota systems, increased education access, and promoting work-life balance policies. However, the most important of all is to inculcate humanity within ourselves.
Women in Corporate Boards Dr. Mamta Binani addressed the issue of women's representation on corporate boards. She encouraged women to be persistent and highlighted the value of experience. Ma'am drew an analogy between the job opportunities that we have, i.e, the size of the cake and the people with whom we compete, i.e, the number of people with whom I will need to share the cake. She said that the number of opportunities shall always be more and shall always go up so much so that we never care about the people with whom we have to compete.
Open Questions and Answers Session and Vote of thanks There was an open question and answer session, encouraging young women to pursue their goals. The speakers emphasized the importance of breaking stereotypes, acquiring skills, and advocated for gender equality. The program concluded with vote of thanks given by Convenor of the program Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Associate Professor, Xavier Law School, St. Xaviers University, Kolkata. The program witnessed a participation of about 200 students from Xavier Law School.
Xavjudice ' 24 - the Annual Intra-Moot Court Competition
Name of the Convenor:Dr. Rajrupa Sinha Roy
Date: 26-04-2024 to 27-04-2024
From the very outset, this competition was poised to be an exceptional showcase of legal acumen, advocacy skills, and diligent research. The stage was set for a thrilling display of courtroom drama, where aspiring legal minds would engage in rigorous debates and articulate arguments that would leave a lasting impact on all who bore witness.
The Moot Court Society of Xavier Law School has organised their Annual Intra Moot Court Competition ‘XavJudice’24 on 26th and 27th of April 2024 at St. Xavier’s University Kolkata. The Moot Court Society conceived the idea of XavJudice’24 more than a year ago through XavJudice’23 and like the previous year, it was the combined effort of the students of the Moot Court Society, Xavier Law School.
The proceedings of XavJudice’24 started on 26th April and 11 courtrooms were organised as a real court to inculcate the feeling of mooting among the students. There were more than 200 students across all semesters of Xavier Law School participated in the preliminary rounds of the competition and judged by the dynamic faculties of the Xavier Law School with more than 20 invited judges from other disciplines.
Moreover, the smooth organisation of XavJudice’24 by the students of the Moot Court Society deserves special recognition. The effortless attempt by the Student Core Committee towards the XavJudice'24 by the Moot Court Society exemplified precision akin to that of a finely tuned mechanism, where every cog and gear functioned seamlessly to ensure the flawless execution of the competition.
On this note, the Moot Court Society, Xavier Law School extends heartfelt gratitude to the Sponsors of the event, the Legal partner India Law LLP, and Adv. Dr. Abu Fazle Mohd. Shamim, and Ammi Jaan Restaurant and The Slice PB as the Food partners. Last but not least, the students of the Xavier Law School, without whom nothing was possible. Their relentless efforts made the XavJudice’24 a grand success.
The Moot Court Society of Xavier Law School has organised their Annual Intra Moot Court Competition ‘XavJudice’24 on 26th and 27th of April 2024 at St. Xavier’s University Kolkata. The Moot Court Society conceived the idea of XavJudice’24 more than a year ago through XavJudice’23 and like the previous year, it was the combined effort of the students of the Moot Court Society, Xavier Law School.
The proceedings of XavJudice’24 started on 26th April and 11 courtrooms were organised as a real court to inculcate the feeling of mooting among the students. There were more than 200 students across all semesters of Xavier Law School participated in the preliminary rounds of the competition and judged by the dynamic faculties of the Xavier Law School with more than 20 invited judges from other disciplines.
Moreover, the smooth organisation of XavJudice’24 by the students of the Moot Court Society deserves special recognition. The effortless attempt by the Student Core Committee towards the XavJudice'24 by the Moot Court Society exemplified precision akin to that of a finely tuned mechanism, where every cog and gear functioned seamlessly to ensure the flawless execution of the competition.
On this note, the Moot Court Society, Xavier Law School extends heartfelt gratitude to the Sponsors of the event, the Legal partner India Law LLP, and Adv. Dr. Abu Fazle Mohd. Shamim, and Ammi Jaan Restaurant and The Slice PB as the Food partners. Last but not least, the students of the Xavier Law School, without whom nothing was possible. Their relentless efforts made the XavJudice’24 a grand success.
One-day workshop on Child rights & social justice
Name of the speakers/consultants/agencies involved:Saptarshi Hazra, Rubina Haque and Sabyasachi Chatterjee from CRY
Name of the Convenor:Dr. Prashna Samaddar & Dr. Sanjukta Ghosh
Date: 19-04-2024
St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata (SXUK), in collaboration with CRY and B.R. Ambedkar Legal Aid Clinic, has organized a Workshop on Child Rights and Social Justice on 19th of April, 2024 inside the university premises at the Albert Huart Hall.
Commenced with the welcome address of Hon’ble Vice Chancellor Rev. Father Dr. John Felix Raj S.J.; the event was graced by the respected guest speakers, Saptarshi Hazra, Rubina Haque and Sabyasachi Chatterjee, from CRY. They enlightened the audience on the situation enveloping child rights and ways in which CRY eases the stringent scenario as well as the ways in which students can be a part of that force (through internships) and augment the entire system. Thereafter, the event was graced by, Sreoshi Patronabish, UNICEF representative who provided insights on the various child protection legislations and for treating those children in conflict with law. The sessions were followed by gripping question-answer session by the extremely perceptive audience.
At the later half of the workshop, the students' team, 'the actvocates', enacted a street play named 'Baastob : The Reality', to throw light upon the despondent and harsh situations faced by the people of lower stratum. The programme also encapsulated the group activities by the students, followed by the session by Dr. Debolina Chatterjee, Assistant Professor, Xavier Law School, SXUK, on the agenda of advocating child rights globally. The audience was completely enamoured by the workshop: leading to a success.
Commenced with the welcome address of Hon’ble Vice Chancellor Rev. Father Dr. John Felix Raj S.J.; the event was graced by the respected guest speakers, Saptarshi Hazra, Rubina Haque and Sabyasachi Chatterjee, from CRY. They enlightened the audience on the situation enveloping child rights and ways in which CRY eases the stringent scenario as well as the ways in which students can be a part of that force (through internships) and augment the entire system. Thereafter, the event was graced by, Sreoshi Patronabish, UNICEF representative who provided insights on the various child protection legislations and for treating those children in conflict with law. The sessions were followed by gripping question-answer session by the extremely perceptive audience.
At the later half of the workshop, the students' team, 'the actvocates', enacted a street play named 'Baastob : The Reality', to throw light upon the despondent and harsh situations faced by the people of lower stratum. The programme also encapsulated the group activities by the students, followed by the session by Dr. Debolina Chatterjee, Assistant Professor, Xavier Law School, SXUK, on the agenda of advocating child rights globally. The audience was completely enamoured by the workshop: leading to a success.
XMC '24 - Xavier Mediation Competition (National)
Name of the Convenor:Dr. Animesh Das
Date: 05-04-24 to 06-04-24
The Xavier Society of Law and Justice (XSLAJ) organised the Second Edition of their national-level mediation competition, XMC’24 – Xavier Mediation Competition 2024 with the kind approval and blessings from Rev. Dr. John Felix Raj, S.J., the Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor of SXUK and Chairperson of XSLAJ, in association with Khaitan & Co & Sharma & Sharma Advocates and Legal Consultants LLP in Xavier Law School, St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata on the 5th and 6th April, 2024. The competition was convened by Dr. Animesh Das, Assistant Professor of Law at Xavier Law School. Modit Gupta, a student of the B.Com.LL.B. (Honours) programme and Ahona Ayushmati Guha Majumdar, a student of the B.A.LL.B (Hons.) programme were the student convenors of the competition.
XMC’24 was inaugurated by Rev. Dr. John Felix Raj, S.J., the Hon’ble Vice Chancellor of SXUK and the Chairperson of XSLAJ. The competition witnessed active participation from students of esteemed national, state and private law institutions and colleges from across India. Many of them also availed the in-house campus hostel facilities. The preliminary rounds were judged by distinguished Partners and Associates of Khaitan & Co and Sharma & Sharma Advocates & Legal Consultants LLP while the quarter and semi-final rounds were evaluated by esteemed guests from the legal profession. The Final Round was judged by Dr. Santanu Mukherjee, Advocate, Supreme Court of India, Accredited Mediator & Policy Advisor, Mr. Shounak Mitra, Partner at Khaitan & Co and Mr. Rishav Dutt, Partner at Sharma & Sharma Advocates & Legal Consultants LLP.
The competition concluded with the award distribution ceremony. The XMC’24 Champion’s cup was awarded to the team from Jindal Global Law School, who were adjudged the Best Negotiating Pair. They were also awarded a cash prize of 50,000 rupees. A student from Jindal Global Law School who was adjudged the Best Mediator was awarded the Best Mediator trophy. They were also awarded a cash prize of 30,000 rupees. The Runner-up Negotiating Pair award was given to students from the National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bangalore, along with a cash prize of Rs. 20,000 while the award for the Runner-up Mediator went to a student from Maharashtra National Law University, Mumbai, along with a cash prize of Rs. 10,000. Furthermore, the winners were awarded with internship opportunities at Khaitan & Co and the Runners-up at Sharma & Sharma Advocates & Legal Consultants LLP. Additionally, all prize winners were given a six-month subscription of EBC Readers by EBC. The winners were also awarded framed certificates of achievement and merit.
XMC’24 organized in partnership with “MediateGuru”, “EBC”, “Pran”, “Nescafe”, “Storia”, “MT Motors” and “91.9 Friends FM” was a resounding success on both qualitative and quantitative fronts. Judges and guests commended and expressed gratitude to the organizing committee for their tireless efforts in ensuring that the event provided the most favourable experience possible, leaving participants with a sense of satisfaction. The hostel-housed students also disembarked following the competition, conveying sincere appreciation to the organizing committee for their hospitality and parting ways with warm regards.
The students involved in XMC’24, in capacities of both participation and organizing, gained significant knowledge from the event and celebrated its remarkable success, eagerly anticipating how XSLAJ can further inspire them, to pursue law, and in doing so, pave justice.
XMC’24 was inaugurated by Rev. Dr. John Felix Raj, S.J., the Hon’ble Vice Chancellor of SXUK and the Chairperson of XSLAJ. The competition witnessed active participation from students of esteemed national, state and private law institutions and colleges from across India. Many of them also availed the in-house campus hostel facilities. The preliminary rounds were judged by distinguished Partners and Associates of Khaitan & Co and Sharma & Sharma Advocates & Legal Consultants LLP while the quarter and semi-final rounds were evaluated by esteemed guests from the legal profession. The Final Round was judged by Dr. Santanu Mukherjee, Advocate, Supreme Court of India, Accredited Mediator & Policy Advisor, Mr. Shounak Mitra, Partner at Khaitan & Co and Mr. Rishav Dutt, Partner at Sharma & Sharma Advocates & Legal Consultants LLP.
The competition concluded with the award distribution ceremony. The XMC’24 Champion’s cup was awarded to the team from Jindal Global Law School, who were adjudged the Best Negotiating Pair. They were also awarded a cash prize of 50,000 rupees. A student from Jindal Global Law School who was adjudged the Best Mediator was awarded the Best Mediator trophy. They were also awarded a cash prize of 30,000 rupees. The Runner-up Negotiating Pair award was given to students from the National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bangalore, along with a cash prize of Rs. 20,000 while the award for the Runner-up Mediator went to a student from Maharashtra National Law University, Mumbai, along with a cash prize of Rs. 10,000. Furthermore, the winners were awarded with internship opportunities at Khaitan & Co and the Runners-up at Sharma & Sharma Advocates & Legal Consultants LLP. Additionally, all prize winners were given a six-month subscription of EBC Readers by EBC. The winners were also awarded framed certificates of achievement and merit.
XMC’24 organized in partnership with “MediateGuru”, “EBC”, “Pran”, “Nescafe”, “Storia”, “MT Motors” and “91.9 Friends FM” was a resounding success on both qualitative and quantitative fronts. Judges and guests commended and expressed gratitude to the organizing committee for their tireless efforts in ensuring that the event provided the most favourable experience possible, leaving participants with a sense of satisfaction. The hostel-housed students also disembarked following the competition, conveying sincere appreciation to the organizing committee for their hospitality and parting ways with warm regards.
The students involved in XMC’24, in capacities of both participation and organizing, gained significant knowledge from the event and celebrated its remarkable success, eagerly anticipating how XSLAJ can further inspire them, to pursue law, and in doing so, pave justice.
One-day National Conference on Women Empowerment for a Sustainable Future
Name of the speakers/consultants/agencies involved:Prof. Dr. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti, Vice-Chancellor, The West Bengal National University of Judridical Sciences, Kolkata
Name of the Convenor:Dr. Mononita Kundu Das
Date: 11-01-2024
The Research Development Cell and Xavier Law School (XLS) of St. Xavier’s University, Kolkata (SXUK) jointly organized a one-day national conference on ‘Women Empowerment for a Sustainable Future’ on January 11, 2024 in the university campus.
It aims to address the pertinent issues related to gender equality and women empowerment in line with the sustainable development.
Rev. Dr. John Felix Raj, S.J., Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor of SXUK delivered the inaugural address. He said, “Structural impediments to gender equality exist and gender-based discrimination persists inspite of the efforts by the government, democratic institutions and other key stakeholders.”
The keynote address was delivered by Dr. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti, Vice Chancellor, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata. He gave an overview of various schemes by Central & State Governments for women empowerment.
He also highlighted the initiatives taken up by legislative, executive and judiciary and discussed various legislations, Women Reservation Bill 2023, and also various cases that have remedied gender inequality, the emergence of Nari Adalat, etc. A total of 61 participants including faculty members, research scholars, students and professionals across the country participated in this conference.
It aims to address the pertinent issues related to gender equality and women empowerment in line with the sustainable development.
Rev. Dr. John Felix Raj, S.J., Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor of SXUK delivered the inaugural address. He said, “Structural impediments to gender equality exist and gender-based discrimination persists inspite of the efforts by the government, democratic institutions and other key stakeholders.”
The keynote address was delivered by Dr. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti, Vice Chancellor, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata. He gave an overview of various schemes by Central & State Governments for women empowerment.
He also highlighted the initiatives taken up by legislative, executive and judiciary and discussed various legislations, Women Reservation Bill 2023, and also various cases that have remedied gender inequality, the emergence of Nari Adalat, etc. A total of 61 participants including faculty members, research scholars, students and professionals across the country participated in this conference.
